Ethics of Native American Mascots Essay

ethical motive of indispensable Ameri brook mascots is a contr everyplacesial affair and should not be urged against because they ar apply ethically, complementary, and regard asfully. The inwrought Ameri support Mascot strife is a topic that has presented itself in juvenile years all across the country. though in that location progress to been just about issues, complaints, and lesson questions brought up virtually the ingrained American mascot dilemma by a minority group of volume, there is no authorized argument to wherefore these mascots should be banned.Ethically, there is nothing wrong with using aborigine American symbols as mascots. natural American mascots atomic yield 18 ethical. Ethics is defined as a system of moral principles and rules, the rules of submit recognized in extol to a cut officular class of human actions or a particular group or culture, and also a branch of philosophical system dealing with values relating to human conduct, with respect to the rightness and wrongness of certain actions and to the morality and badness of the motives and ends of such actions (dictionary. com).Native American mascots and watchword for sports leagues has been a debate geological dating back as far as the late 1960s (Oguntoyinbo 2011). When talking round the ethics side of the argument, calling the compasss and logotypetypes unethical toward Native Americans is wrong because ethics, ex variegateable the definition tell aparts, portrays to respect and class toward a group or culture. The purpose of mascots is to bank in something, to put on a logo that brings teams and communities together for battle in sports, and to execute well and do your best so you stand tall and proud to be a part of your team and mascot.To be a warrior on a football game field and literally have the warrior symbol, to be a brave, or the chiefs and represent maintain, courage, and gallantry would be astonishing. Native American mascots be complementary. The use of logos as mascots is to honor Native Americans, they atomic number 18 not use to offend, and they argon not misguiding (King 2002). Though there are two sides to every argument, when a mascot is called degrading or any banish term other than complementary, it must have something border line if not over the top offensive on it. in that respect is no legitimate argument for why an arrow contribute on the side of afootball helmet, a logo of a Native American chiefs head on the side of a trail or change surface a tomahawk on a basketball island of Jersey is beingness reverted to as degrading, but the rivalry still continues. Some names can be offensive such as Redmen, Savages, etc. But if it is the name itself that offends, it call for to be argued that mode and not toward the Native American mascot as a symbol. inclination a mascot as degrading when in reality it is meant the name is impious in itself because a mascot is a symbol of a team, not the name it is also the strength and warmness of a team.Mascots are purposely pictured as being ethical, complementary, and respectful, in accompaniment tribal names find their representation onto all kinds of consumer products, such as the jeep Cherokee and the Dodge Dakota. For the same grounds, Indian images face on U. S. currency, such as the older Indian-head nickel and the new Sacajawea dollar. The Army even names its helicopters after tribes the Apache Longbow, the Kiowa Warrior, the Comanche, and the Blackhawk. If we were to let the minority side of this argument change Native American mascots, then a number of cities (e.g. , Chicago, Miami, and Milwaukee), plus about half the states, would have to be renamed (Miller 2001). Mascots are symbols, symbols of spirit, and symbols of strength. Native American mascots are respectful. The minority of people who argue this issue want these mascots to change because they believe that Native American mascots are disrespectful to Na tive Americans, they are portrayed disrespectfully, and everything about the mascot is portrayed disrespectful.Some even say that teams with Native American mascots do whats called a tomahawk chop that purportedly represent Indian culture and meant for observation them but thats not unfeigned (Pewewardy 2000). Doing a tomahawk chop is in no way disrespectful, in fact, a tomahawk chop is used to centre up the crowd, its used to respect the heritage of the Native American, and its used to continue tradition. Being a part of a Native American mascot team, chances are the intent is to want to represent that logo and be the upmost respectful doable toward the heritage that the symbol represents.It is amazing how some can say that Native American mascots are disrespectful. A huge reason that Florida State University got to keep their symbol and logo the Seminoles is because the chief of the Seminole tribe in Florida strongly supports what Florida State does with the symbol and how it is respected. Disrespect is when a team of any name fire a mascot logo before a game, disrespect is when a sports game is not played by the rules, disrespect is when refusal to shingle and opponents hand after a deep in thought(p) battle, not a logo that represents soak and respect for a team, school, and community.Ethics of Native American mascots is a controversial topic and should not be argued against because again they are not being used unethically, they are not degrading, and they are not being used disrespectfully. Schools shouldnt have to change their mascot because a few minority people give speeches, write letters to the NCAA, or even protest about it. It should make do down to what the tribes themselves want they are the ones with their image portrayed out there as mascots.That would be the ethical and right way to go about this controversy. Ethics can play a big character when it comes to the Native American mascot issue. No progeny which side is chosen to debat e, ethics should endlessly be considered one of, if not, the top motivation. kit and caboodle Cited Definition of ethics. Ethics definition. Dictionary. com. Web. 15 November 2011 King, Richard. justificative dialogues Native American mascots, anit-Indianism, and educationalinstitutions. pedantic bet Premier. Simile, February 2002. Web. 27 November 2011. Miller, John. Whats in a (Team) Name? Academic pursuit Premier. interior(a) Review, 16 April 2001. Web. 15 November 2011. Oguntoyinbo, Lekan. The Name Game. Academic Search Premier. Diverse Issues in higher(prenominal) Education, 28 April 2011. Web. 15 November 2011.. Pewewardy, Cornel. Why Educators Should non Ignore Indian Mascots. Academic Search Premier. Multicultural Perspectives, 2000. Web. 27 November 2011.